Sermon preached by the Reverend John E.
Kitagawa at the Celebration of the Holy Eucharist on Sunday, 2 May 2010 (The
Feast of Saints Philip and James, observed) at St. Philip’s In The Hills
Parish,
On
The site was to be
in the foothills of the
Precious little is known about our patron
saint, Philip. Artistically, Philip is
often depicted with a cross, on which he is believed to have suffered (see
painting behind me, or front of your bulletin).
In a story called the Golden Legend, Philip is credited with driving
away a noxious dragon of the
In John, Philip is credited with persuading
Nathaniel to follow Jesus (John
The story of the Loaves & Fishes is
often called the Feeding of the Five Thousand, or the Miracle of the Loaves and
Fishes. These titles suggest the
significance of the story is the end result.
One can certainly make a case for this conclusion. Author Parker Palmer would have us approach
the story differently. After working
hard, Jesus and the disciples have gone away for a period of prayer and
meditation. But, the crowd, eager for
more healings and instruction, follow them to the place of their retreat. In Matthew, Mark and Luke’s versions of the
story, the disciples urge Jesus to send the people away because it is late in
the day; it is a deserted place; there is no food; and, they have no financial
resources. Only Matthew and Mark tell us
specifically why Jesus does not send the crowd away. It is because “he had compassion for them”
(Matthew
In his book, The Active Life[5],
Palmer takes on the magical aspect of the story directly. He begins with a reminder that
… the Jesus who
makes bread multiply here is the same Jesus who refused to make bread by magic
when challenged to do so by the devil. If the feeding of the five thousand were no more
than a magic act, I think we could hear the devil off in the distance
chuckling, “I won!”[6].
The elements of
what Palmer understands to have happened are instructive to individuals, to
families, and to this community of faith.
Instead of a magic act, Palmer suggests
Jesus acted on the assumption of abundance.
Mark’s account provides us with this little gem.
Then [Jesus]
ordered [the disciples] to get all the people to sit down in groups on the
green grass. So they sat in groups of
hundreds and fifties (Mark 6: 39-40; Luke 9: 14).
This seems like an insignificant
detail. However, anyone who has done
community organizing work knows the value of gathering people into face to face
groups. Palmer puts it this way:
… clustering people
into more intimate settings [is] where miracles have a chance to happen.
… Jesus replaces
the dulling anonymity of the crowd with the energy and personalism of
human-scale groups. Friends spot each
other. People greet and embrace, full of
the joy of recognition and the excitement of the event. Animated words are exchanged about this
phenomenon called Jesus … … this
collection of isolated individuals is re-collected into the organic,
interactive reality of life together.
… the very
experience of community is itself an experience of abundance. In the faceless crowd, we experience
scarcity—a scarcity of contact, of concern, of affirmation, of love. … True abundance resides in the simple
experience of people being present to one another and for one another[7].
Does this explain how five thousand people are
fed with the meager resources of five loaves and two fishes? Please note another significant but easily
overlooked detail. After Jesus blessed
and broke the five loaves and two fishes, all four gospels record either that
Jesus gave “them” to the disciples to set before the people (Mark 6: 41; Luke
9: 16), or that Jesus gave “them” to the disciples to distribute among the
people (Matthew 14: 19; John 6: 11). Nowhere
in the Gospels does it say or suggest that the loaves and fishes were magically
multiplied by the time they left Jesus’ hands.
Also, please note there is nothing to suggest that before or after the
blessing the disciples withheld any of the meager rations for themselves. Again, Parker Palmer,
Perhaps [the
people] found themselves moved to emulate the generosity of Jesus and the
disciples rather than hoard their scarce resources. Suddenly, through a community ignited by an
example of generosity, scarcity turns into abundance. It happens not by magic but by the live
encounter of people who have been helped to re-member
each other and themselves[8].
I return to a detail I glossed over
earlier. Jesus blessed and broke the
loaves and fishes. Of course he did,
what is the big deal here? First, in
this action, Jesus acknowledges gifts have been given, and that he and others
depend on gifts beyond their making. We
would do well to approach life with this mindset. Secondly, Jesus expresses trust that there
are forces and powers other than his own at work. This relieves him of the burden and perhaps
paralysis of total responsibility, and frees him to respond as best he can with
the resources at hand. Unfortunately,
this trust is often misinterpreted into a slogan like, “Let God do it,” thereby
avoiding personal responsibility to act.
In Palmer’s words,
… every human being
is an incarnation of the holy, [and] we
all have the potential to live out that holiness[9].
Archbishop Tutu offers
a similar thought:
Without us, God has
no eyes; without us, God has no ears; without us, God has no arms. God waits upon us, and relies on us . … you
should not be daunted by the magnitude of the task before you. Your contributions can inspire others,
embolden others[10].
At the beginning of the story, Jesus and the
disciples try to retreat for a period of prayer and contemplation. Palmer defines contemplation as “any way we
unmask illusion and reveal reality[11]. Through the story of the Loaves and Fishes,
Jesus gives us an opportunity to penetrate the illusion of scarcity, and to
touch the reality of God’s abundance. I
conclude with Palmer’s story about penetrating his illusion of scarcity and his
touching the reality of God’s abundance.
The story revolves around involving a friend from the Peoples’ Republic
of China.
… this man offered
to cook a Chinese dinner for eight of us, and we quickly accepted. I drove him to the grocery story and stopped
at the bank on the way. I assumed we
would purchase a cartload of groceries.
Like the disciples, I was certain this feeding would require a good deal
of cash.
… my Chinese friend
purchased only enough vegetables, eggs, rice, and a few other items to fill a
small bag. We paid ten dollars or so and
headed home.
He gathered us in
the kitchen and showed us how to help prepare the meal. We found spices, brought out pots and pans,
made sauces, separated eggs, and chopped those vegetables so fine that I
thought they would disappear. Instead,
they multiplied, and so did our joy. We
spent the better part of the afternoon talking and laughing and learning.
The actual cooking
took hardly any time. Six or eight
dishes were prepared and set on the table before an astonished group. From that small bag of groceries had emerged
a dinner large enough to satisfy all of us—a satisfaction that was laced with
joy, the wonder of sharing in a rich and ancient culture, the delight of each
other’s company, and the sense that we had somehow stepped closer to world
peace. The alchemy of love had turned
scarcity into abundance[12].
May all of our contemplations about the
significance of St. Philip’s Day help us to penetrate our illusions of scarcity
and to touch the reality of God’s abundance.
AMEN.
[1] Mary Huntington Abbott, The Holiness of Beauty: St. Philip’s In The
Hills Episcopal Church, 1936 – 1986 (
[2] David Hugh Farmer, The
[3] Matthew 10: 3; Mark 3: 18; Luke 6: 14.
[4] Kathleen Jones, The Saints of the Anglican Calendar (
[5] Parker J. Palmer, The Active Life: A Spirituality of Work, Creativity, and Caring (Josey-Bass
Publishers, San Francisco), 1990.
[6] Ibid,
129-130.
[7] Ibid,
130.
[8] Ibid,
131.
[9] Ibid,
136.
[10] Desmond Tutu, God Has A Dream: A Vision of Hope for Our Time (
[11] Op
Cit, Palmer, 134.
[12] Ibid,
233-134.