Sermon preached by the Reverend John E. Kitagawa at the Celebration of the Holy Eucharist on Sunday, 27 June 2010 (The Fifth Sunday after Pentecost) at St. Philip’s In The Hills Parish, Tucson, Arizona

 

A DIFFERENT KIND OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS

II Kings 2: 1-2, 6-14; Galatians 5: 1, 13-25; Luke 9: 51-62

 

   Three weeks ago, we celebrated the Holy Eucharist in a side garden of the Church of the Beatitudes, overlooking the Sea of Galilee.  Instead of a sermon, I asked participants in the Interfaith Journey to the Holy Land to share reflections on their experiences to that point.  I was surprised by the depth of their experiences after only three days on the ground.  One member had observed and been touched by the diversity of Christian people coming from around the world to strengthen their relationships with Jesus Christ, and to deepen their faith.  He said, “Just think of how much good could be accomplished if we could harness all that spiritual energy and power to work together!”  This comment came to mind frequently during the tour. 

 

   The Church of Pater Noster is located on the Mount of Olives, east of Old Jerusalem.  It is believed this is where Jesus taught the disciples to pray the Lord’s Prayer.  On the garden and cloister walls is the Lord’s Prayer in 50 or more languages.  As we waited our turn to get into a small chapel, we could hear group after group praying the Lord’s Prayer in their own languages.

 

   Yardinet is the designated Baptismal site on the Jordan River.  It far from where it is believed John baptized Jesus.  Here, Christians in our group renewed our Baptismal vows.  A few feet from us was another group, perhaps from south Asia, was doing the same thing.  Our approaches were different.  We, in true Episcopal fashion, took off our shoes and socks, rolled up our pants and waded into the Jordan, shin deep, and after appropriate prayers, sprinkled a little water on one another.  The other group waded in waste deep, then proceeded to fully immerse one another in the Jordan.  Two different approaches, but we shared the joy in renewing our commitment to discipleship, and knowing the blessings bestowed on us in such service in Christ’s name.

 

   For me, the power and meaning of diverse Christian disciples was manifest at other sites, like the Church of the Multiplication (dedicated to the miracle of Jesus feeding the multitudes), the Church of the Transfiguration on Mount Tabor, or walking down the Mount of Olives on the Palm Sunday Road.  I was particularly aware of fellow Christians on the Via Dolorosa, the Way of Sorrow, the walking of the fourteen Stations of the Cross.  It is a very personal, powerful and sobering experience to walk and pray with Jesus the journey from condemnation to crucifixion.  Being aware of the diversity of peoples in pilgrimage groups walking the path before and after us gave me a sense of spiritual kinship, and thus deepened the meaning of the experience. 

   I must note that you will have an opportunity to hear the reflections of some of the other participants of the Interfaith Journey on Sunday, 18 July 2010, at a 10:15 am Forum.   I know your hearts will be touched by their witnesses.

 

   As you know this was an Interfaith Journey, so we had a number of Jewish experiences, including one of my personal highlights.  On Friday, 11 June 2010, by special arrangement, we o welcomed Shabbatt, the Sabbath, within the Jerusalem Archeological Park.  This means we were at the Western Wall of Temple Mount, one of the most sacred places in Judaism.  Rabbi David Wilfond from Hebrew Union College began by blowing the shofar, the ram’s horn, and then proceeded to explain and lead us in worship.  Following the service, we walked on the excavated pavement that Jesus would have walked on as he visited the Temple.  We walked past the ruins of the money-changers’ stalls where Jesus overturned tables in his anger.  At the Southwest corner of the Wall, we saw the replica of a rock that had fallen when the Temple was destroyed in 70 CE.  On it is an inscription noting the place where the shofar had been blown back in the Temple era. 

 

   Two aspects of the experience live within me in powerful ways.  First, I had a sense of spiritual continuity as we participated in ancient Jewish ritual and worship.  We were not praying to someone else’s God, or to a foreign God.  As clearly as ever, I understood that there is one God, who we worship through our different traditions.  So, just as the journey renewed my sense of relationship and one-ness with fellow Christians, the journey gave me the same senses with fellow Jews.   Secondly, the only word I can find for Friday evening’s experience is mystical.  There we were, worshipping in a manner Jesus Christ would have recognized, in a language he would have understood, in a place that he knew intimately.  At one level, I feel spiritually and emotionally closer to Jesus, and that is important.  Perhaps of greater significance, however, is a renewed sense of openness and dedication to learn what Jesus was all about, and to work as hard as I can to do his work in the world.  

 

   The Gospel for my first sermon after returning from a pilgrimage to the Holy Land in 1996 was a gift, a softball, a way to connect with integrity to the pilgrimage.  That Gospel was Jesus’ invitation to Matthew:  “Follow me” (Matthew 9: 9), and Matthew “got up and followed him”.   So, I was curious about which Gospel passage the lectionary would give me to preach on today.  This Gospel is not what I would call a softball, but upon reflection, it ties in very nicely, at least with my experience of the Interfaith Journey.  Just a few moments ago, I spoke of “a renewed sense of openness and dedication to learn what Jesus was all about, and to work as hard as I can to do his work in the world.  I could, and you could, metaphorically speaking, be one of the three individuals that Jesus encounters in today’s Gospel, or perhaps a fourth or fifth person Luke does not feature in his story. 

   In Luke’s Gospel, these stories come in the context of Jesus “turning his face to Jerusalem” (Luke 9: 51), which follows Peter’s Confession that Jesus “is the Messiah of God” (Luke 5: 20; see also Matthew 16: 16; Mark 8: 29).  Peter’s Confession took place in Caesarea Philippi, a holy site on the itinerary of the Interfaith Journey. 

   Let us see how these encounters speak to us today.  The first man says to Jesus, "I will follow you wherever you go" Luke 9: 57).  One might characterize Jesus’ response as less than pastoral: "Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head" (Luke 9: 58).  In other words, "Have you counted the cost? If you follow me, the Kingdom of God is now your home. And the journey is more important than the destination. What we do as we walk along beside one another will be more important than the destination. For all your enthusiasm, have you counted the cost?" 

   The second man also does not receive a sympathetic or welcoming response from Jesus.  If anyone ever had a good excuse to delay discipleship, this man seemed to have it.  In Jewish tradition, burying a parent was a duty of great importance (Luke 9: 59). This falls under the commandment to honor one's father and mother. In fact, in Judaism all other normal religious obligations could be set aside in order for a person to bury the dead.  Luke tells us Jesus would have none of it. "Let the dead bury their own dead; but as for you, go and proclaim the Kingdom of God" (Luke 9: 60).  In other words, the preaching of the Kingdom of God takes precedence over familial relationship and obligations.

   The third wannabe disciple displays good family values and says to Jesus, "Let me first say farewell to those at my home" (Luke 9: 61).  To which Jesus responds: "No one who puts his hand to the plow and looks back is fit for the
kingdom of God" (Luke 9: 62).  In other words, "Leave the past behind."  "Following me means new life. You can't plow a field with your eyes looking behind you. Leave the old for the new"[1].

   Luke does not tell us whether any or all of the would-be disciples became followers, or whether they went away disappointed or disillusioned.  Perhaps they followed at a distance, hanging around the edges of the community, but never making the life-changing, transforming “all-in” commitment to put Jesus and the kingdom of God at the core of their lives, and to make these the driving forces of their activities. 

 

   Jesus’ responses seem more extreme than necessary.  They are harsh, unfeeling and confrontational, but one cannot miss the point.  Discipleship is about conversion and commitment.  However these happen in our lives, excuses and delays seem to fade.  It is where we find courage and creative ways to overcome obstacles, and to meet challenges that once daunted or scared us.  Conversion and commitment are sources of motivation and energy that keep us learning what Jesus was all about, and working as hard as possible to do his work in the world.  Conversion and commitment lead to faithful living becoming central motivating forces, not just in our Church lives, but through our whole lives.  Jesus asked the first man whether he had considered the cost of discipleship.  I believe another question has to be asked.  Have we counted the cost when we do not commit to discipleship?  Who suffers, and who does not experience healing or reconciliation?  Who will not be touched by the affirming and transforming love of God?  I think it is legitimate to once again place before you the observation of the Interfaith Journey participant:

 

Just think of how much good could be accomplished if we could harness all that spiritual energy and power to work together! 

   AMEN.